PULVERDAMPF

Herakles hat geschrieben:Freizeitbeschäftigung

Maddin hat geschrieben:Die Schweiz muss grundsätzlich mal gar nix, bevor die sich von der EU was ganz negatives aufzwingen lassen treten sie halt aus Schengen aus. Wie sowas geht zeigt doch beispiel auch Ungarn, man muss nur wollen. Tun kann die EU NICHTS dagegen.

Octopus hat geschrieben:http://www.20min.ch/schweiz/news/story/EU-will-Schweizern-Sturmgewehre-verbieten-22577465?redirect=mobi&nocache=0.5428451725747436

[emoji38]
Da werden die Eidgenossen aber erfreut sein...

Thule hat geschrieben:

Herakles hat geschrieben:Freizeitbeschäftigung

Al3x hat geschrieben:Die Schweiz kann sich diesen Blödsinn sicherheitspolitisch gar nicht leisten, das lässt deren Sicherheitsdoktrin und das Wehrgesetz gar nicht zu.
Einen Dreck werden die machen.

Al3x hat geschrieben:Die Schweiz kann sich diesen Blödsinn sicherheitspolitisch gar nicht leisten, das lässt deren Sicherheitsdoktrin und das Wehrgesetz gar nicht zu.
Einen Dreck werden die machen.

Based on the discussion in the EP so far, and as she understands the situation in Council
, the
Rapporteur takes it that the proposal in this respect has little realistic prospect of approval.
The Rapporteur has considered the option to include all semi
-
automatics in category A unless
they are included in category B or C. However she believes
that this approach is unworkable.
Therefore, the Rapporteur would invite your views on the following alternatives:
4.1 to revert to the existing legislation,
or
4.2 to consider a package of
i.
clarifying in Art 2(2) that “armed forces” cover the defence
forces as defined under
MS law with all units and persons under their command, including, where relevant,
the home guard, reservists etc. if authorised or obliged to acquire or possess category
A firearms,
ii.
maintaining the possibility for MS to grant
authorisations also for category A in
special cases, while clarifying possibly that with examples of types of persons which
could be considered for authorisations (via an open list), and a further description in a
recital of the nature of associated string
ent requirements,
iii.
ensuring that shortening a firearm (making it more easily concealable) is considered
manufacturing, and therefore illicit unless done by an authorised dealer, and
iv.
rejecting the proposed move of category B7 to A7 (as B7 requires a
uthorisation in any
event).

Herakles hat geschrieben:Es dauert nicht mehr sehr lange und wir dürfen unsere Knallstöcke und Bleispritzen selbst zum Schmelzofen führen
und kurz danach unsere Bürgerrechte und unsere Freiheit.

Octopus hat geschrieben:Übersehe ich etwas oder ist das nicht eh super?

5. Authorisation requirements
5.1....
With respect to all persons, the Rapporteur invites your views on whether:
iii. controls on large capacity magazines would contribute to public safety, e.g. by permitting them only for recognised target shooting organisations, on condition that the magazines are kept by those organisations and only possessed under their control on their ranges,

5.2 In addition, “standard medical tests” for the issuing or renewal of authorisations are proposed, and a five-year limit for the duration of an authorisation.
The Rapporteur invites views on whether:
i. to replace the proposal by a system allowing MS to choose to implement either periodic medical and psychological review or a continuous monitoring system,
ii. to clarify the language of “standard medical tests” or reject it, and if rejected,
iii. to develop the requirement in Art 7 for periodic verification by requiring MS to implement continuous monitoring to ensure that the conditions under which an authorisation was granted continue to apply.
Aspects MS could consider for a system of monitoring include appropriate medical and psychological testing, time-limited licenses, in particular for certain categories of firearms, verification of the continued need for possessing a firearm and continued practice in its use etc.

7. Ammunition
ii. clarify that only ammunition for the specific firearm/s held can be acquired.